“The Boy at the Back of the Class” at Queen Elizabeth Hall – 07/04/26

Welp, it’s been quite a news day hasn’t it? I was sitting perilously close to the news channels at work and all day, the gruesome twosome of Don and Ye were in my peripheral vision, with headlines that bounced between extremism and apocalypse (again). So what better to restore my faith in humanity than a piece of theatre about children accepting and helping a refugee boy? Roo had read the book in primary school but couldn’t quite remember what happened and I’d never read it so was going in with totally fresh eyes. Still, the 7+ age rating made me confident that it would probably land on the life-affirming side of theatre, rather than feeding into the “we’re all doomed” narrative of the BBC today.

I wasn’t sure we’d ever been to the Queen Elizabeth Hall before and definitely not for a show. A quick flick back through the blog suggests that Roo and I visited on a soggy day in April 2012 when the Royal Festival Hall was booked out for a corporate event. Weirdly enough, Roo doesn’t remember that day and the blog post from back then makes it sound like I was a bit grouchy (which I probably was, given I was overdue with VK and it was raining). So def time to give this building another chance. It’s a nice, sun-filled foyer space and a pretty big auditorium:

Plus really comfortable seats, which I appreciate after some not-so-comfy shows recently.

If, like me, you’re not familiar with the plot, here’s the basics – a new boy called Ahmet joins a class of 9-year-olds and they slowly discover his story as a Syrian refugee. It’s told through the eyes of Alexa, Ahmet’s classmate, and takes in the usual classroom archetypes – the bully, the jock, the nerd and how they each interact with this newcomer.

It’s a simple enough concept but gosh darn, did it pull at the heartstrings. I wasn’t the only one dabbing my eyes at the end and I’m sure if VK had been there, she would have joined me in the weeping. Even Roo described it as “emotional”. But I’m getting ahead of myself.

First, a word for the set. It seems very simple – a standard-issue piece of PE apparatus – but it transforms into everything from a double decker bus to Buckingham Palace. There’s great use of lighting to accentuate the changes in scene, with the palace lit in red, white and blue and red lighting to signify intensity or danger.

Photo by Manuel Harlan (@manuelharlanphotography)

The costumes are mainly school uniforms but they’re effective to turn the (I assume) adult cast into small children. All the child characters have costume details to make them stand out from each other tho – an abundance of hairbows for the spoilt Clarissa or trainers, knee socks and a plaster for the sporty Josie. There are also some impressive Queen’s Guards outfits later on.

Alexa is played by Sasha Desouza-Willock, who brings pathos to the role of a child struggling with loss and trying to find meaning by helping a friend. Ahmet is played by Serkan Avlik, who is of Kurdish heritage and so delivers the Kurdish lines with authenticity. He’s described by Alexa as having eyes like a lion and you can kind of see what she means….but his eyes are also haunted by what he’s been through. I can see why these roles were not played by actual 9-year-olds – it must be harrowing to relive Ahmet’s story every night and it needs a certain maturity to be able to deal with that.

Photo by Manuel Harlan (@manuelharlanphotography)

Rounding off the gang are Abdul-Malik Janneh as Michael, Petra Joan-Athene as Josie and Jonny Warr as Tom. It’s kudos to all these actors that they can effectively play children and get that balance of being kids-at-the-edge-of-growing-up just right. When Alexa and Tom are exploring London without their parents, a cab driver raises his eyebrows slightly at them being unaccompanied but they’re not so childlike that it would be outrageous and that’s a fine distinction to pull off. I remember Roo at that age being involved in a piece of theatre at Stratford East called, simply, “Nine” and that looked at what a pivotal age the end of primary school was….when you’re starting to walk home alone but are still very much a child.

And the lead actors reflect this well – all five of them have the energy of 9-year-olds – running around the stage to the “Mission Impossible” music – but are also starting to question what’s truly important in life and reflecting on their different levels of privilege. It has a lot of depth for a piece of children’s theatre.

Photo by Manuel Harlan (@manuelharlanphotography)

Where this play truly packs a punch is dealing with the issue of immigration and small boats. The book was published in 2018 – when Reuben was, in fact nine, and I think it’s probably set around then as well, given a reference to the Queen being 92. So the era directly after the Brexit referendum, with talk of a “hostile environment” and “stopping the boats”. I think the timeline is slightly fictionalised as there’s a hard deadline at the end of the month where the borders will be closed and this provides the momentum for the second half of the play. But the sentiment is very familiar, and remains so today. Brendan the Bully and his father (both played by Max Jordan) give voice to the aggressive nationalism – calling Ahmet “filthy” and “smelly”. At times, this is visceral and shocking, especially when a scene turns from joy to violence so quickly. It’s a powerful statement to make when the political landscape is more divided than ever and it’s just a pity that the people who watch this piece will largely be the ones who already embrace diversity and inclusion. But hopefully it will sow a few seeds of hope in a pretty bleak looking landscape.

While there are adults in this play who voice the aggression, there is also a lot of counterpoint, particularly in the warm hearted portrayal by Natasha Lewis of both the teacher Mrs Khan and Alexa’s mum. Her compassion and patience towards Ahmet is truly transformative and even bully Brendan is thawing by the end. Eleanor Patel, Evie Weldon and Fedrat Sadat round out the cast as Alexa’s classmates and other characters she encounters through the story, such as the magical Mr Musa and the aforementioned Clarissa.

Photo by Manuel Harlan (@manuelharlanphotography)

The age rating I would say is about right – it’s definitely not one for tiny children as there are some really quite intense emotional moments and it’s two hours long, including the interval. But for children who are that little bit older, it’s a relatable tale of friendship and wild ideas (“Let’s visit the Queen!”). My giant child enjoyed it and, even though he’s already made his mind up on all things political, I think he enjoyed the thought-provoking nature of the piece. There are a lot of laughs alongside the more sombre moments and a great deal of heart. If you’re anything like me, you will leave the theatre misty-eyed but that’s more of a recommendation than anything. Just remember to pack some tissues…

“The Boy at the Back of the Class” runs until 12th April at the Southbank Centre and then resumes touring. For tickets and more info, click here.

Disclaimer: I received Press tickets in exchange for a review. All opinions remain honest and my own.

Posted in Reviewing the Situation | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“Oh Mary!” at Trafalgar Theatre – 30/03/26

You may recall that we’ve been to see a play about Mary Todd Lincoln recently and it wasn’t this one. I’m not quite sure which strings MTL posthumously pulled to get herself a West End double bill but I feel like the “Oh Mary!” version of her would be delighted. After all, her dream is to be a cabaret star.

If you think that sounds frivolous for a play about a woman whose main characteristic is “grieving” then you’d be right….this is indeed frivolous. But the weird thing is that, in some ways, it is every bit as intense as “Mrs President”. Neither play about MTL is a relaxing experience.

And they’re similar in some ways – both near Charing Cross, both one act plays with no interval, both with a small cast and very little in the way of scenery changes. That’s probably where the similarities end though.

I’ll get into a bit more detail about the actual play in a moment but first, for anyone who is confused – the Trafalgar Theatre is a proper theatre auditorium on the same footprint as the Trafalgar Studios where I saw “Julie Madly Deeply” all those years ago. I don’t know what I was thinking when I booked the tickets but even when we arrived at the theatre, I somehow thought it was still a studio set up….so I was quite surprised to be in a full-on auditorium. Apparently it was refurbished in 2020 but hey, that was not a great theatre year for us.

I was also surprised when we stopped at the Trafalgar Square Waterstones on the way. I’ve only ever been to the ground floor and cafe and thought it was tiny…but VK found a lift down to the basement and it’s huge.

Of course VK went straight to the GCSE revision guides and was very scornful of the cover of “Lord of the Flies”. Teens know how to have fun, hey? She also wanted to buy yet another copy of Les Mis to celebrate its birthday but we negotiated and I was pleased to get away with only buying a small amount of art supplies. No one wants to take an unnecessary Victor Hugo novel to the theatre, do they?

So, onto the show itself! The main pull of this production for us was seeing Mason Alexander Park in a lead role after their supporting-but-scene-stealing turns in “The Tempest” and “Much Ado About Nothing”. With Catherine Tate taking over the role soon, time was ticking so I booked as soon into the Easter holidays as I could, just for VK and I. Roo is on a bit of a mission to see Doctor Who actors in theatre, so he and Nathan may well go and see the show once she takes over. Mason is a total star, with a phenomenal singing voice but I wonder just what they could do with a character that is a bit more likeable than this version of MTL. It was a stellar performance, don’t get me wrong, but a friend described this show as “weird” and she wasn’t entirely wrong.

The story is set in the last days of “her husband”‘s life. Mary is a drunk and a thorn in the side of all around her. Her bubbly companion Louise (Kate O’Donnell) is keeping her distance after being pushed down the stairs and the husband (Scott Karim) is busy lusting after his assistant (Oliver Stockley). Meanwhile, John Wilkes Booth (Dino Fetscher) is swinging by to give Mary acting lessons. Chaos ensues.

I mentioned already that this show is intense and it is, albeit in a more upbeat way than “Mrs President”. Lines are shouted, there’s a lot of physical humour and more than a little gross-out comedy. Mary is a livewire whose next move is highly unpredictable and so the characters and audience are both constantly on edge. There’s a distinct panto feel to the whole thing, though I think the inspiration is Victorian melodramas – the blackout at the end of each film feels like the gaps in a silent film. And despite some of the more uncomfortable moments – the bucket scene, for example – each of those gaps was filled with rapturous applause.

The cast are excellent and the lines are delivered with a zing, which helps move the show along at a pace. None of the main characters are exactly likeable, especially Mary herself, but somehow they become almost sympathetic by the end. The husband is an especially nasty piece of work but yknow, he had the weight of the free world on his shoulders whereas Mary doesn’t seem to care about the war (“the South of what?” she says repeatedly). There are some great set pieces, like Mary trying to lever open the desk drawer to find whisky or the bit where she’s spinning atop the walnut desk. I also enjoyed the lengthy “Tempest” interlude, given Mason’s previous performance. And although it’s right at the end, we do eventually get to hear their singing voice through one of Mary’s “Madcap Medleys”.

Was it enjoyable overall though? I think so and VK certainly did, judging by her guaffawing. It was often uncomfortable watching and my nerves were jangled quite a lot….but there were a lot of laughs along the way. It was certainly jauntier than the other MTL play but it was not the most soothing of productions. In Mason Alexander Park, there is a true talent but I feel like I’ve yet to see them in the perfect role. Maybe someone will do a “Hedwig” revival in the West End…

Posted in Reviewing the Situation | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“The Wrong They Knew” at Chickenshed – 06/03/26

Copyright Chickenshed

In the midst of a crazy busy choir week, it’s good to escape to another time and place for a while and let someone else worry about providing the entertainment. So taking in a brand new show at Chickenshed seemed just the thing to take my mind off my responsibilities for a while.

The weather was not exactly on our side and neither were the Chase Side buses. So VK and I hopped in an uber for the last mile or so, which might be my Chickenshed hack going forward. VK is still on crutches but seems to be a bit more motivated when theatre is involved. As she proudly told me, she’s been to the theatre four times since breaking her ankle. I thought we’d had a slow theatre year so far but when you say it like that, it’s not so bad. This was the fifth time. More theatre trips than French lessons apparently.

Quelle histoire!

She’s also been thinking about 1950s racism this week, thanks to an unexpected word usage from her favourite character in “Lord of the Flies”. I had no idea that word was in that book and it turned out that it had been censored in the edition she’s reading…but it sparked a discussion about historical context, which chimed with the disclaimer for this show. It’s about racial tensions between the black and white communities of the 50s and the trigger warning mentions that the play uses attitudes of the time. It also gives a few spoilers for the plot so yknow, don’t study it closely.

The world of the play is an almost-historical one. It’s set in Forest Hills, which may bear some resemblance to Notting Hill, and there’s a character called Osmos Floozeley…you can guess who that’s based on. So it’s not strictly based on a true story, like “The Washing Line” was but it is based on some things that might have happened within that context.

There is quite a complex set of characters to get to know but all the threads come together nicely in the second half. There are the kids (Zeeko and Romy, tonight played by Kayla James and Karl Leyens), the teens and their parents. Then there are the nationalists, led by Rob Awol (Jimmy Adamou) who abuses black people in public and beats his daughter Madeline (Tilly Morton) in private. As you can tell, there are some intense themes in this play but there is plenty of lightness too – out of the tension, creativity flourishes and Carnival is born. Using the children and their artwork as a framing device works well to give the situation an air of innocence. They are tasked to collect stories and scenes from the neighbourhood, so act almost as narrators and comic-book style illustrations appear on the screens throughout the piece, showing key scenes as they’re happening. The two child leads did a great job of juggling their spoken and sung lines as well as being on the stage for a large part of the action.

The teens represent the bridge between different groups, with white Jackson (Felix Figgis) and black Theo Junior (Ajani Onaolapo) trying to rearrange their classroom seating plan so they can sit together, along with support from their mixed-race friend Diello (Kailee Fisher). However, this is the 1950s and Theo is forced to sit at the back and Jackson at the front. It’s a stark illustration of what life was like for those trying to overcome divisions. That scene also had one of the biggest laugh-out-loud moments where the “Our School is English” song referenced Jesus being turned away for not having a British passport. VK certainly laughed out loud anyway.

The teens are also responsible for a teaching moment where they are lectured on respect by Jackson’s father Isaac (Jonny Morton) after harassing a shy disabled man. These teens might be groundbreaking in their racial equality but they still represent the idiocy that teens occasionally get up to.

The grown ups mainly focus around solicitor Isaac and his colleague Iris (Cara McInanny) as they strive for “Justice for All” as well as organising the carnival. At one point, Isaac is accused of being a “white saviour” which might be a bit of a modern concept but I’m sure the idea was there in the 50s, even if the exact phrase wasn’t. It is strange to see Jonny Morton playing a nice guy, after some notable villain stints, but he is very convincing in the role. Cara McInanny is a Chickenshed stalwart and her motherly role on stage probably reflects her mentoring role behind the scenes. She also wrote some of the songs I believe. Her voice is always impressive and she’s given a real chance to shine in the final song – “The Wrong They Knew”.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. There’s plenty that happens before that point. The first half of the play introduces the characters and the police oppression they live under (“Routine Check”) before moving on to the school scene and then Isaac and Iris setting up a Legal Aid stall. It’s interspersed with vintage newsreels as well as bits of narration from the children. There’s a lot going on but by the end of Act 1, the main conflict is being set up as the nationalist leader’s daughter Madeline develops an obsession with Theo’s dad (Theo Senior, played by Shiloh Maersk). As tensions grow, the company sing a sinister version of “There was an Old Lady Who Swallowed a Fly”. There are a few moments during the piece where nursery rhymes and folk songs are used as incidental music and this is the most striking example, taking a simple children’s rhyme and turning it into something much more threatening. Act 1 finishes on a cliffhanger, which threatens to destroy even the fragile peace that the residents of Forest Hills know.

Then we went for ice cream (Strawberry for VK, Mango and Passionfruit sorbet for me) and chatted about how we thought things might play out in Act 2. From the content warning, I was guessing it wouldn’t be great for Theo Senior.

Act 2 was intense but VK and I agreed it was even stronger than Act 1, which is unusual in theatre (cough Hamilton, cough). The tensions grew and boiled over into racist riots, with the nationalists trying to smoke black families out of their homes. This led to one of my favourite moments, which was the song “Weaponised”. The two groups are dancing on either side of the stage – the nationalists are doing rock n roll style moves on the right, while the black families and their friends are dancing to a more reggae-infused tune on the left. The song cuts between each group until they finally clash in the middle. This being Chickenshed, the dancing is top notch and although there are 200 people on stage at times, everyone knows where they’re meant to be and how their part contributes to the whole. It’s not surprising, after we’ve seen so many brilliant productions, but the effect is always dazzling. There’s always a lot of energy in these routines but increasingly sophistication too, with precision partner work and tricky lifts being held in place. The backflips from the nationalists were particularly impressive – I might not like their attitudes but gosh, they’ve got some good moves.

A quick word about the set too, which was also impressive. Some large wooden slatted pieces on either side of the stage convert to a courtroom, a classroom, a street scene and so much more. The walls are daubed with racist graffiti and there are so many little details that give it an authentic 50s feel. The costumes too are very authentic – all stiff petticoats and immaculate police uniforms. It really helps to immerse the audience in the world of Forest Hills.

I won’t give any spoilers about how the story turns out but I can say that it’s bittersweet. Although progress is made, and dances are danced at Carnival, there is loss and pain along the way and a feeling that this will never quite be resolved.

Well yes, look at the political landscape today and the rise of Reform. If we ever stopped worrying about this, it’s time to start worrying again.

So a timely, powerful piece with something important things to say about race and prejudice but also with a lot of joy and heart. It will make you think, it may make you cry but it will stay with you. At the end, VK was the first one her feet clapping and she said it was brilliant. What more recommendation do you need?

“The Wrong They Knew” is on at Chickenshed until 28th March. Click here for tickets and more info.

Disclaimer: I received press tickets in exchange for a review. All opinions remain honest and my own

Posted in Reviewing the Situation | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“Mrs President” at Charing Cross Theatre – 21/02/26

So it’s been nearly a week since our exhausting “two shows and an ordination” day and I’ve only just found the time to write about the second show. I’ll pick up where I left off, which was us leaving Southwark Playhouse and considering our next move in the unglamourous surrounds of Elephant and Castle in the rain. My top priority was getting some dinner in before the evening show and VK suggested a trip to Honest Burger. So we waited for the 176 bus for a while to take us to Covent Garden but then I changed my mind and we instead hopped on a 68 to go to the branch in the Southbank Centre. My flawless logic was that it was bigger than the Covent Garden branch and so we were less likely to be queuing in the rain.

That logic did not logic. After briefly getting confused with people who might be gatecrashing the BAFTAs, we became people who were, in fact, queuing in the rain.

I did consider changing plan again and actually gatecrashing the BAFTAs but David Tennant wasn’t presenting this year, so it barely seemed worth it. Instead, we hung around for 15 minutes or so and were eventually admitted.

Honest Burger is always good food and quick so we know what to expect and it was exactly what we needed. We probably took it a bit too fast but we were painfully aware that other people were now waiting for our table and we had a show to get to.

Not that it would take long to get there. Part of the genius of the Southbank plan was that we could just walk straight over the Golden Jubilee Bridge afterwards and it would bring us out exactly where we needed to be. I remembered that there was only a lift on the northern side of the river for the bridge closest to the London Eye and so we went down the slope towards the carousel, found the lift and crossed the river that way. VK is still struggling with stairs, post injury so this seemed sensible. I forgot that she also struggles with bridges but hey, we’d cross that bridge when we came to it.

(I apologise, that was Reuben levels of groanability)

I maintain it was a good route, even in the drizzle. You can’t beat this view, can you?

It was such a good route that we were actually about 45 minutes early for the show. See, I told you we didn’t need to eat so fast. VK was exhausted after speeding over the bridge as fast as her crutch could manage so we sat down for a moment on these giant marbles on Villiers Street:

And with still quite a long time to go before the doors opened, we went to the Charing Cross Theatre bar and kinda hovered awkwardly with drinks and nowhere particular to put them down. I was glad when we could go through, even if it meant VK having to do a flight of stairs downwards. Apparently she can find the motivation when there’s theatre involved….not so much for her French lesson.

If you’re not familiar with this play, let me enlighten you. It’s a two-hander about Mary Lincoln and her photographer, Mathew Brady. It stars Keala Settle, Hal Fowler and…no one else. That’s what a two-hander is. It’s not to be confused with “Oh Mary”, which is the other Mary Lincoln play currently on in the West End. That other play is a touch more….frivolous than this one I think. There’s nothing frivolous about “Mrs President” and fans of Keala’s singing will be disappointed to know that it is strictly non-musical.

The play tracks the Lincoln/Brady interactions throughout her time in Washington, starting with Mrs President in a large pink dress and ending in her mourning black. I don’t think I need to worry about spoilers do I? Things don’t go well for the Lincoln family. Over the course of the play she loses first her son and then her husband and starts to feel as if she’s also losing her mind. It delves deep into the psychological trauma of so much loss so quickly (she also refers to another son who died before the play starts) and it feels intense, verging on harrowing. I had to keep reminding myself that this was entertainment.

The kids LOVED it by the way. Maybe misery and trauma appeal to dramatic youths. That’s what happens when you let them read Victor Hugo.

There are certainly some powerful performances. Keala’s descent into torment is sensitively done and she visibly strives to hold on to her sanity while also carrying burdens that would break even the strongest person. Hal Fowler is unlikeable as Brady and, again, that’s a testament to his acting ability. Both the kids commented how great an actor someone must be when they get you to really hate a character. Brady tortures and gaslights Mary in the name of his art and Hal Fowler really gave the character a spiteful, narcissistic edge that ramped up the tension immeasurably. However, it’s not like Mary is always a likeable character – she too has hints of narcissism and self-centeredness and it’s sometimes hard to know who to root for.

Was this a relaxing experience? No. After the heartbreak of “Ballad Lines” we possibly should have gone for something fun and fluffy in the evening but, as I explained in the last post, that is not how the booking process worked. This was visceral at times and there were some jump scares that made VK physically flinch in the seat next to me. Something bad happens to a bird, although I think it was dead to start with, to be fair. And there are references to child death, executions, slavery and insanity. It is not a light watch.

But was it enjoyable? Yeah, I think so, kinda. The kids thought so. I felt on edge the whole time but was drawn into the story so wanted to know how it would all resolve. The lighting and set design were great – I spent quite some time wondering how a solid panel of scenery could become transparent and I never did work it out. The costumes were fabulous and, I’d hope, era-accurate. I might have to check in with a colleague on that one. So there were many positive elements but the script needs to work hard when it’s 90 minutes of two people talking and there were times when it felt a little repetitive. As in, we had been over these themes or stories already and how ,much more was there to say?

A dance number would have helped.

I think though, that I probably have quite low brow tastes and don’t often engage with the more challenging end of theatre. So this was that more challenging, dark piece that I know some theatre goers would love. Others might be triggered by the constant trauma and grief. It’s lacking in warmth and while the two leads spark off each other, there isn’t a lot of dialogue that feels like the way humans normally talk to each other. I think I just find it hard to watch psychological torture…but I think I’m OK with that.

The piece could do with being a touch shorter, just to take out some of the repetition and up the pace but there’s no faulting the talent on show here. Both leads are remarkable – Keala’s deep well of emotions is so raw and, towards the end, it absolutely just rips out of her. Hal Fowler is nimble and switches character to impersonate his photographed subjects, as well as playing the photographer himself. He never steps into pantomime villain but has the audience constantly tense, waiting to see what his next move will be.

In conclusion then, not a comforting watch but an interesting one. If you enjoy having your pulse and blood pressure raised, go check it out. In such a small space, it is a very intense experience as well – we were in the second row and it was remarkable to be so close to the action. But if you’re after something heartwarming, maybe try and get seats to “Paddington” instead.

“Mrs President” runs until 8th March. For tickets and more info, click here

Posted in Reviewing the Situation | Tagged , | 1 Comment

“Ballad Lines” at Southwark Playhouse – 21/02/26

Saturday was a complicated day. You might wonder why I’ve not blogged in a while but the answer lies in the last post I wrote… that ol’ crutched teenager. So we’ve been having some very boring weekends at home while her ankle heals but my birthday is coming up and so we decided to attempt a day out. It just got a lot more complicated as it went along.

The planning started with booking “Mrs President”. Nathan knew that I was sad to have missed Keala Settle at “Dracapella” so this might make up for it. Also, I’d mentioned that I fancied seeing “Oh Mary” with Mason Alexander Park and aren’t all Mary Todd Lincoln plays created equal?

Well no, but more on that in another post. Because you might notice that this isn’t a review of anything MTL related. It’s a review of “Ballad Lines”. Because we had to go to Colindale first, obviously.

If this is still making no sense, let me step you through my thought process.  “Mrs President” was booked first, for a 7:30pm show. Then we got an invitation to a dear friend’s ordination in far-off Colindale at 11am. It didn’t seem worth going home between the two events so what better way to fill in time than with a matinée? And that’s where “Ballad Lines” comes in. It was affordable and I knew Southwark Playhouse had a lift so it seemed doable with the crutch. All make sense so far?

Yes? Good!

More sense than my chosen route to Colindale which saw us kicked off the Mildmay line (not for bad behaviour) and then stuck in traffic on Edgware Road for hours? Probably.

Still, we made it to the ordination only slightly late and VK managed to hobble the 15 minutes back to Colindale tube afterwards. She had to sit down briefly in Colindale Park but it was just when Reuben decided to scale a giant rock so that all worked out well.

Travelling most of the length of the Northern Line in between ordination and matinée proved to be slightly challenging, time wise but we scooted into our seats at the Playhouse with a full 6 minutes to spare. 

I knew almost nothing about the show before we saw it except that the music was folky and the story followed the lives of three different women, who were all related. And that’s pretty much the basis of it, except it’s four women really – Sarah is our main protagonist, in modern day New York. Betty is her recently-deceased auntie from West Virginia. Jean is a distant ancestor from Ulster and Cait is an even more distant ancestor from Scotland. They each lead very different lives but all know the same songs – the ballads – which are passed down from generation to generation. One of the songs is called “The Four Marys”, which was appropriate given the play we were going to be seeing later on. Maybe we need another two MTL shows to make up the full four?

The cast was nearly all female, with just one male actor. The music director and band were also female so it was very much a woman’s perspective on history. It would make a great outing for International Women’s Day. Maybe less so for Mother’s Day….but I’ll get to that.

The narrative device is a series of tapes that Aunt Betty has left for Sarah talking about the family history of ballads. Some of the early tapes feature a baby Sarah herself while the  last one is recorded just before Betty’s death. If we can get over the unlikelihood of a Millenial instantly knowing how to work a tape deck, then it’s a great framing device.

(Yes, i know that I myself am a millennial but I’m at the very oldest end and Sarah is at the tequila swigging end so….)

I won’t say too much more about the plot, for fear of spoilers, but the tapes pull Sarah into her bloodlines in a way that is both revelationary but also destructive. When Sarah’s partner Alix wryly refers to it as Pandora’s Box, she’s not wrong. 

The music is really central to this story and the characters from the different eras often sing together, resulting in some beautifully rich harmonies. Although there is a small band (piano, guitar and violin), the songs aren’t over-orchestrated and the vocals are given a lot of space to resonate around the space, as they would have done on a Scottish Moor. When the instruments do get the spotlight – as in a lively dance scene – they are superb but it’s the arrangement and the balance of the songs that really  makes this work.

So to the performances. Frances McNamee is Sarah, playing her as traumatised but optimistic, building a new life for herself with Alix. She is a very flawed character and makes some bad decisions but is still likeable and has some great chemistry with Sydney Sainté, who plays Alix. Alix is a very sympathetic character, despite ending up as something of an antagonist to Sarah and Sydney Sainté’s performance captures all of that complexity. Their voices blend well together as they duet and their decluttering sequence is one of the lighter moments of the show, which is played lightly and deftly.

Kirsty Findlay plays Cait, the 17th century Scottish ancestor, who is the wife of enthusiastic minister Jamie (played by Ally Kennard). Cait is another complex character, who loves Jamie but doesn’t want his baby. In fact, she sings a song about a baby being an unwelcome visitor. I’ll try to remember it for next time the kids are annoying me. The theme of motherhood being a burden is woven throughout, as the plight of women in history is contrasted with the choice we have today. It’s not that the show condemns motherhood entirely, but it certainly highlights the privilege of being able to marry who we like, or not marry at all and to have children when and how we want to….or not at all.

As I said at the beginning, possibly not one to go to for Mother’s Day. Although I was there with my own kids and they didn’t take offence at it. In fact, after hearing Alix’s rant about bringing kids into such a messed-up world, I felt the need to apologise to them. Listen, it was a different time in 2008 when we decided to have children. It was a touch less…..fascisty.

So Cait’s story is challenging but still relevant for today. She’s played as initially feisty but eventually defeated, after a struggle to assert her autonomy. Kirsty Findlay has a lovely voice and you can well believe that she is channelling the spirit of a 17th century woman. Gracie Lai plays the other woman from this era – Morna – and while it’s a smaller part, she imbues it with all the drama that the scene requires (again, with the lack of spoilers). Gracie Lai is also a vital supporting player as one of the ensemble voices along with the other main characters.

I mentioned Ally Kennard earlier as Jamie but, as the sole male actor, he is the only one to appear across all three eras. He plays Sarah’s brother Ronan and an Irish doctor as well as Jamie. All three characters have a similar feel – put-upon and accepting of the story moving around them – but they are all played very sympathetically for the most part. Jamie has some moments that are less than ideal but make sense in the context and you can see the passion that’s put behind the delivery of those lines. There was also one moment where he starts singing offstage and VK and I both thought it was Reuben suddenly piping up from the row behind. I don’t know what made us both think that but it must have been a similar baritone quality to the one we hear so often singing Les Mis when he’s meant to be revising. Anyway, it was not Reuben singing, thankfully, but it’s strange that we both had the same thought.

The main Irish characters were played by Yna Tresvalles as pregnant teenager Jean and Siân Louise Dowdalls as her sister Shona. They have a great sisterly energy, teasing each other at first but then clinging together as the situation turns more grave. They sing beautifully together and the affection between them is evident. They are also responsible for one of the most heartbreaking scenes, which was responsible for a general shuffling sound around the room as multiple audience members fished around their bags for tissues.

This happened again during the ending, with an excerpt from the final tape. Rebecca Trehearn as Betty acts as a narrator for the most part but the ending reveals a deeper emotional level to her and we all joined Sarah in weeping as she explained why she behaved as she did. It’s a credit to the writers – Finn Anderson and Tania Azevedo – that all these characters have such depth to them and they are well cast. Rebecca Trehearn is convincingly maternal as Betty but with a hard edge to her and, as you might have guessed by now, she is also a wonderful singer.

I think all four of us enjoyed it, even with the implication that marriage and children ruined your life. The songs were catchy and the music was heavenly. Although some of the plot was harrowing, it was still ultimately a positive story about connecting to your past and going on a journey of self-discovery. Considering I knew nothing about the plot before we saw it, it was a very easy show to get immersed into and to still be thinking about long after we left. Not that we had much time to think before we went to the next show but still, that’s another post….

“Ballad Lines” is on at Southwark Playhouse until 21st March. For tickets and more information click here

Posted in Reviewing the Situation | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

“The Producers” at Garrick Theatre – 10/01/26

Now, I think I mentioned before that I was worried about how “The Producers” would go down with a woke, GenZ audience. The awkward silence at Musical Con only confirmed my theory that the show might just be a tad too politically incorrect for London in the 2020s. So was it? Well, we’ll get on to that.

Cause it turned out I had bigger things to worry about with this trip. Is this a crutch I see before me?

Why yes, it is and it belongs to VK. Not because she’s cosplaying Tiny Tim, although that is plausible, but because she took a tumble on New Year’s Eve and fractured her ankle. As I was quick to point out to anyone who would listen, no drink had been taken. Just a typical hypermobile dyspraxident gone bad.

So how to get a child to the West End on crutches? And how to get them up 88 stairs to a Grand Circle? Well, that was the question for last week, when we had tickets to “Christmas Carol Goes Wrong” at the Apollo Theatre. I emailed the accessibility team at Nimax Theatres as soon as we had confirmation from A&E that it was broken and their response was….nothing. I heard nothing. So Nathan and Reuben went without it and took some friends from church to use the extra tickets. And I promised VK I would work out a solution for the next booked show, which was “The Producers” at the Garrick Theatre, another Nimax venue.

I got back on the horse and emailed the accessibility team again. If dealing with schools and local authorities has taught me nothing else, it’s persistence. This time I got a response – they had seats free in the Dress Circle, which was on street level. All I had to do was pay £50 per person to upgrade.

Essentially, that reply was “you really should have bought better seats to start with, you tight wad”. 

Now, don’t get me wrong. I never expect freebies. I’ve seen a number of shows on press tickets and I am always grateful every time I’m given one. The majority of West End shows we’ve seen have been ones we’ve paid for. So I’m not a grabby person. At the same time though, this was a genuine accessibility problem and when I looked back, I realised we had visited Nimax theatres six times over the last year (it helps that they have the Lyric, where “Hadestown” is). If I was a customer service rep, looking at my order history and situation, I might have  been tempted to at least discount those seats a tad rather than use a child’s ankle breakage as an upselling opportunity.

Anyway, I thought on it a little. Our seats were in the Grand Circle, which was only 33 steps up…so a lot easier than the 88 at the Apollo. But she’s only just mastering the steps in our own house and that’s without crowds of people tutting behind her. So I paid £100 to upgrade my seat and VK’s, let Nathan and Roo sit in the original Gods seats and mentally offset the cost by eating at home first instead of grabbing a Five Guys before the show.

Still, it didn’t sit well.

I will get on to talking about the actual show, I promise. But first the next challenge – getting there. And before I launch into my complicated plans, I want to acknowledge that this is only temporary and that many people have to navigate this world with a disability every day. I know theatres have restrictions on changing their buildings so I don’t think there’s an easy solution but it is sad that so much of the West End is inaccessible. 

As is the tube! So our usual route of Weaver-Vic-Pic was not going to work. Instead, we drove to Essex Road where we parked up and got the 38 as far as Cambridge Circus. Then we hopped (quite literally in VK’s case) a 29 to right outside the theatre. It wasn’t the fastest way to get into town and the drive both ways was a little stressful, with Saturday night traffic and eventual fog, but it worked. The other option I was considering involved the Mildmay Line from Hackney Central to Camden Road and then the 29 but that would depend on coming in on Platform 1 at Hackney Downs, which isn’t guaranteed. So a bit of driving and a bit of public transport seemed like the way to go. It took about one hour 20 each way, which is about twice as long as usual and there was a woman on the 38 who looked like she might stab us at one point.

She didn’t. It’s all fine. Still, I was relieved to be in our expensive seats:

Finally, onto the show! I love “The Producers” and the film soundtrack is on constant rotation in the car, which means that the kids and I did know some of the jokes before they happened. I don’t think that matters though, and there were some sight gags that were unexpected, along with a couple of songs that aren’t in the 2005 film. I have seen the live show before but that was also in 2005ish so there were definitely bits I’d forgotten.

I mentioned earlier that this show might not be GenZ-friendly and I stand by that, even though my own GenZ and Gen Alpha both enjoyed it. It makes fun of gay people, old people, Swedish people, German people, accountants, theatre people, Jewish people, Irish people and well, most people really. The female characters are objectified and there is a lot of innuendo. You might wonder why I, as a lefty liberal feminist Jewish Millennial, am not offended by any of this and the answer is in that list really – if everyone comes in for a swipe, then it’s not especially offensive to anyone. It’s dialogue that originates from the 60s and is set in (I think) the 50s so the humour is a reflection of that time. Also, it’s a very affectionate swipe on the most part. You can choose to be offended by “Keep it Gay” but it’s a celebration of the contribution that the gay community have made to theatre. Even if they don’t actually all live in the same house and go to fabulous fancy dress balls every night. Similarly, the song “King of Broadway”, which wasn’t in the film, gets into some very caricatured Jewishness at one point, including a routine that I think is a nod to “Fiddler on the Roof”. But again, it’s not a harmful stereotype when the writer of the original film was Jewish, the stars of the film were Jewish and the characters are Jewish. Jews have always been good at self-depreciating humour and even in these most challenging times, we still reserve to laugh at ourselves. If “Springtime for Hitler” had come from a pen that wasn’t Jewish, it would be problematic but as it is, it’s just satire.

On that note, I’m going to go off on another brief tangent before refocusing. Just this week, Walthamstow was in the news after refusing to let the Town Hall be decked in swastikas for a WWII era film. Instinctively, I think LBWF made the right decision on this one, as there are so many real-life neo-Nazis around at the moment and it would be a bad look for the Town Hall to display flags which might be seen as sympathising. However, we must be able to separate art from reality and we have seen several musicals lately which use swastikas as part of the narrative (“Cabaret”, “The Book Thief” and “Operation Mincemeat”). In some cases, they are used to shocking dramatic effect and in others they are used to mock the Nazis. The latter is definitely true here and honestly, I have no problem with either use, which is just as well when the swastika is picked out in giant flowers at the back of the stage. It’s the appearance of them scratched into school furniture or on stickers on lamposts that perturbs me. But that’s a whole other post.

While I’m on the subject of the set though, I did worry that this was going to be a “bare bones” kinda production and I didn’t know how that would work. Something the cast said at Musical Con about how their set was more basic than the previous production made me think it would be Edinburgh-fringe-style one chair and a brick wall. It wasn’t. While I see what they meant about the smaller scale of the set, there was still everything that was needed to set the scene, including the iconic office door, the “Opening Night” revolving sign and the aforementioned giant flowery swastikas.

Also, the costumes were more than elaborate enough to offset any lack of detail elsewhere. Roger deBris did indeed resemble the Grand Duchess Anastasia and the show outfits in Act 2 were almost blinding in their sparkliness. And I don’t want to give any spoilers but there’s a very special outfit that appears in the Franz Liebkind rooftop sequence. It’s all very over-the-top and gloriously indulgent, so my concerns about it being too basic were entirely unfounded. The performances are over the top, with some great physical comedy between Bialystock (Andy Nyman) and Bloom (Marc Antolin). They never try to exactly replicate the performances that have gone before but they have exactly the right kind of threadbare charisma (Bialystock) and nervous energy (Bloom) that the characters demand.

The supporting cast are also great. Trevor Ashley seems to be thoroughly enjoying himself as Roger, with many winks to the audience and Kate Parr nails both the look and the belt of Ulla. And that’s a theatrical belt, not a cardboard one like Max wears. She even manages to sing while hanging upside down at one point, which is quite the achievement. Raj Ghatak is deliciously bitchy as Carmen while Michael Franks is perfectly unhinged as Liebkind. I’ve taken the casting from the screen in the foyer, by the way, as we I think we had a couple of understudies on….but I apologise if I’ve got anyone’s name wrong.

The ensemble rapidly change characters, from Max’s gang of old ladies to Irish coppers via the De Bris household. I enjoyed the tap dancing usherettes and the zimmer-frame routine, both of which have great vocals to match. Which leads me to one slight nitpick – during “That Face”, Ulla and Leo dance on a plinth towards the back of the stage but it’s covered in a kind of plastic sheeting so makes a weird muffled sound. I’m not sure whether that’s an intentional creative choice but it jarred in a routine where everything else seemed to be very precisely choreographed.

That’s just a tiny nitpick though. There is much to love about this production – the meta jokes work so much better on the stage than they did on the screen and VK howled during one particular moment in “Betrayed”. There’s a brief reference to “Chicago” which she also very much enjoyed. The chemistry between Bialystock and Bloom is both affectionate and tense and the whole cast seem to be having a great time. Their enthusiasm is truly catching.

The theatre itself feels like the perfect place to stage this – the heavy red velvet feels very trad-Broadway and immerses you straight away into Bialystock’s world. In case you’re keeping tabs, I went for Jude’s Vegan Vanilla interval ice cream and VK had Haagen Dazs because they had something other than Jude’s for once. She also scammed me for popcorn, raspberry lemonade, a pigeon-duck and this very sparkly bottle of water. I’m not sure I made that £100 back really.

In conclusion, this is not the most PC show but it’s thoroughly enjoyable and will raise your spirits even on a foggy, gloomy January night. We may take a break from theatre trips for a while until VK’s ankle is healed up but I’m glad we made this work.

Posted in Reviewing the Situation | Tagged , | 1 Comment

“Dracapella” at Park Theatre – 03/01/26

Shortly before Christmas, Nathan and I were meeting up with old friends in Kennington. We passed the White Bear theatre pub and Nathan mentioned the time we saw a musical version of “Dracula” there. I blithely said that it had been too long since we last saw an acapella vampire production, knowing full well that tickets to “Dracapella” were waiting for him inside a Christmas present card. Luckily he likes that kind of thing. He even dressed for the occasion:


We’d never been to Park Theatre before, although I kept meaning to book tickets for the whodunnits. It’s super handy for us as it’s a quick pop down the the Vic line and then two minutes’ walk from the station. It’s a new-ish build, so has plenty of toilets and is DDA-compliant, which a lot of the older theatres are not. More on that at a later point.

I booked this show on a bit of a whim, not realising that the phenomenal Keala Settle was in it. To be honest, the name that sold it for me was Dan Patterson as I am a kid of the 90s and remember that name being said every week on “Whose Line is It Anyway?” by whichever comedian had won the show. So I thought it would be fast-paced, silly humour and I was right. This show had one-liners, bad puns and pop culture references in abundance.

What it didn’t have, on the night that we were there, was Keala Settle. She’d been taken ill and her character (Lucy) was being played by the musical co-ordinator Awsa Bergstrøm with the script in front of her. I was a bit disappointed to not see Keala, especially as we’d been watching her turn in “Wicked” earlier that day, but we seem to have a bit of bad luck with listed cast members at the moment. I should say though that Awsa Bergstrøm did an incredible job and her vocals blended perfectly with the rest of the cast, despite the lack of rehearsal time.

What to expect of an acapella version of Dracula? Well, it starts out as a fairly faithful adaptation of the book, 80s pop hits and other anachronisms aside. The mysterious Count (Ako Mitchell) lives in his castle in Transylvania and is visited by trainee solicitor Jonathan Harker (Stephen Ashfield), who soon begins to suspect this isn’t a normal property transaction. Yes, he might have taken the rail replacement bus to Dover but, other than that, the plot is the one you already know. The ending is where it all deviates a bit and it’s a lot happier than you might imagine, but isn’t that just the magic of theatre?

Every sound in the show is made through the voice alone (aided by microphones) so ABH Beatbox is on hand to provide sound effects and backing tracks. It’s impressive because some of those 80s songs are quite musically complex and the ensemble is only eight people in total. There’s Lorna Want as Mina Harker, Monique Ashe-Palmer as Dracula’s servant Pustula, Ciarán Dowd as her husband Sinister and Philip Pope as….just about everyone else. There’s a lot of changing hats, Mincemeat style, as characters duck in and out of the story. The turnaround near the end between Sinister and Van Helsing is, if not slick, still remarkable.

The two leads are both strong – Ako Mitchell is suitably dramatic as Dracula and Stephen Ashfield plays it very straight as Harker, despite all the madness going on around him. If anything, Dracula himself is slightly underused but I guess that’s the nature of the book, as it’s from Harker’s perspective. It’s the other actors who really have fun with the show, I think – from Ciarán Dowd’s bantering with the audience to Lorna Want donning a mullet wig and bouncing around on a spacehopper. I did mention the anachronisms a few times already, right? The puns range from the “cracker-standard” to the cracking (“I just can’t see myself living somewhere with no mirrors”.) It feels like Tim Vine was involved in the script writing and I’ll let you decide whether that’s a compliment or not.

So, the songs are well-crafted, the jokes hit and the dramatic stakes couldn’t be higher, even if Van Helsing himself was wielding them. What’s not to love? The set and costumes are fairly basic but that works well with the frenetic nature of the piece. Some reviews commented that the songs seemed shoehorned in and I can’t argue with that but neither do I see it as a problem. You know right from the start that this is going to be an unorthodox version of the story – it’s Dracula scrolling through Tinder that gives it away. From there it’s just a hop, skip and bite to superman-infused Bonnie Tyler cover versions. If this doesn’t sound like your thing, then you probably won’t enjoy it. But if you like something a little bit unhinged, then lean right into it.

Incidentally, Jeremy Corbyn was there. I’m not sure what he made of it as I couldn’t make out his face once the lights went down. It’s a pity cause I’m sure some of the jokes about the current government might have made him smirk. But it was a nicely surreal touch to an already surreal evening. It would have been marvellous to hear the power of Keala Settle in a small venue but we still left the place grinning stupidly. And that’s what you want from an acapella vampire show, isn’t it?

“Dracapella” runs until 17th Jan – click here for tickets and more info.

Posted in Reviewing the Situation | Tagged , | 1 Comment

“Christmas Comes to Moominvalley” at Jacksons Lane – 12/12/25

Image copyright Jacksons Lane

They love the laughter and they love the living….but do they love Christmas? That’s what I was going to find out as I travelled to Highgate to see “Christmastime comes to Moomin Valley” at Jacksons Lane. It’s a venue I’ve been wanting to go to for a while but have never had a reason to. Plus there’s some Highgate-related trauma from around 2007 that I should probably be over by now. I try to forget some bits of that year. 

But I haven’t forgotten what a pretty little station Highgate is. I’m a sucker 1930s Northern Line stations and look! Such lovely tiles!

And Jacksons Lane is also a very handsome looking venue:

Inside it’s all very nicely fitted out and, at the moment, there are Moomin-y details everywhere:

The auditorium is smallish but the seats are comfortable and there’s plenty of legroom. I should really have taken Reuben with me to properly test the limits of the legroom tho as that child is all leg. He was tired tho, from being out at the panto the day before and VK was tired from…life so neither of them could be persuaded off the sofa and across to Haringey. I was flying solo to Moominvalley. 

VK would have found a friend in the Moomins though, as apparently they sleep straight through from October to Spring. She would enjoy that. In fact, the whole basis of the show is that the Moomins usually sleep through Christmas and so have no idea what it is. They’re terrified at first but slowly come to realise that Christmas is nothing scary. Clearly they haven’t been to one of our family Christmases.

It’s a cast of five extremely hardworking actors, who are acrobats and musicians as well as playing the characters. It starts with the humans dressed as the Woodies, larking about in the snow and showing off some amazing juggling skills. There are some incredible acrobat feats too – one actor (Carys Nicholls) seems to be able to do everything upside down, including singing, which is particularly impressive. Her partner-in-tricks is Julia Chan, who I think also plays Moominmamma…..the core strength the two of them have is amazing. Myles McDonald is the juggling pro, Adam Boyle does a lot of the character work and Xenia Garden both sings and plays the harp. That’s a lot of skill to pack into a small cast. 

The circus part with the Woodies at the start is quite lengthy so if you have littlies who are impatient to see the actual Moomins, you might want to pre-warn them. I can see why it’s structured that way though, because the Moomin costumes don’t lend themselves to acrobatics. But worry not – before long, there is indeed Moomin-y action as the Woodies recount the time that Christmas arrived in Moominvalley.

The plot is this – the Moomins are having their winter sleep when The Hemulen arrives at their door to wake them up and make them get ready for Christmas. They stumble sleepily into action, following cryptic prompts from the scooter-riding Fillyjonks, and start decorating a fir tree and finding presents to offer to “Christmas”, whatever that might be. It’s all very gentle and cosy – although there is some peril, it’s very mild and the Moominfamily are determined to face it together. There’s a poignant moment as Moominpappa and Moominmamma snuggle together on the swing, just waiting for Christmas to arrive, and it is very reminiscent of the classic Moomin illustrations. This is pure comfort fodder and the gentle soundtrack complements the soothing feel of the whole piece. The songs that are played on the harp are particularly beautiful.

The actors switch characters with lightning speed – they change in and out of the Moomin costumes and reappear to play the Woodies and the other characters. The Moomin heads are very adorable, with eyes that slowly blink and somehow manage to express a range of emotions, despite only having one moving part. In contrast to the energetic Woodies, the Moomins move slowly and cautiously and it’s kudos to the cast that there is such distinctive characterisation throughout.

The show isn’t complex in terms of plot but it is wondrous – we feel the cautious joy of the Moominfamily as they create offerings of shells and blueberry pie for the Christmas beast. We see the togetherness as they resume their sleep at the end of the story. And there are circus tricks scattered throughout, which will keep even the tiniest audience members enthralled. It’s a great introduction to the world of Tove Jansson for new fans but long-term Moomin devotees will find plenty to enjoy here as well. Many of us choirsters may remember a dear friend who was obsessed with Moomins and I think she would have loved this show. To me, there’s no greater endorsement than that.

So if you’re looking for a piece of comforting Christmassy magic, head to Jacksons Lane this December. It’s a short piece of theatre but it manages to be both awe-inspiring and sweetly poignant. It’s a perfect Christmas treat.

“Christmas Comes to Moominvalley” is on at Jacksons Lane until 4th January. For tickets and more info, click here.

Disclaimer: I received tickets in exchange for a review. All opinions remain honest and my own

Posted in Reviewing the Situation | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“Dick Whittington and his Catford Cat” at Broadway Theatre – 11/12/25

I hate to start this post with a brag but I’m going to go for it. I took Reuben for a pre-theatre Nandos and, after quite some wrangling, managed to update the app and log in. Do you know what I found? Yes, dear readers I had the Red Reward of delight, which meant that Reuben’s meal was free. Forbid it that I should boast but I’m really quite pleased with myself. We also saw the Catford Cat, which is a must when in SE6, right?

Anyway, onto the main event which was the Catford panto in the gorgeous Art Deco Broadway Theatre. You really should go there just to look at the light fittings. The detail is stunning:

I’d read the press release for the panto,  which described it as “important and meaningful” and that made me slightly concerned that this might be one of those fun-free productions where everything is terribly worthy. But fear not….there were plenty of fart gags in among the meaningful bits. And I mean plenty

This was pure panto with everything you’d expect – pies in the face, a pantomime dame, random pop culture references and cheesy and/or slightly “blue” jokes. There was an important message, which I’ll get to, but there was lots of fun as well. I need not have worried.

Copyright Broadway Theatre

The story of Dick Whittington transplants nicely onto the chosen setting – the arrival of the Windrush in 1948. I would say that the script plays fast and loose with this setting and there are scores of anachronisms, from ancient sailing ships to Jet2 Holidays references. But that’s all part of the fun and doesn’t detract from the themes of welcome and inclusion. The premise of the plot – a man seeking his fortune by coming to London from far away – is basically what happened with the Windrush Generation and the show doesn’t shy away from some of the challenges they faced.

Dick meets and falls in love with a white girl called Alice, which immediately seems like it’s going to cause issues in 1940s society. Cue a gorgeous version of “Rewrite the Stars” in harmony, as they decide they can overcome other people’s prejudice. Dick is accused of being a thief, which seems to underline the mistrust that black people face in society even today. This being panto, the actual culprit was a humanised cat hypnotised by a humanised rat. Boo hiss.

Copyright Broadway Theatre

The show has a lot to say about the richness of diversity and pokes constant fun at Reform and the likes of Trump (represented by a pufferfish) and Nigel Farage (portrayed as a rat with a flatulence problem). In the face of constant rows about immigration, it’s a bold move to send such a clear message about the positive contributions that immigrants make. Potentially it’s alienating some right wing punters who might enjoy the more traditional content but I applaud the political stance the show takes and agree with the press release that this is an important message for these times.

Copyright Broadway Theatre

There’s a strong cast – Aunt Sarah may joke “I don’t see any in this show” after someone says “I see stars” but she’s wrong on that. Dick is played by Durone Stokes and he’s a confident performer, with a smooth baritone voice and boundless energy. Alice is played by Fergie Fraser and her voice and energy compliments Dick’s nicely. The sound when the two of them sing together is pure magic.

Copyright Broadway Theatre

Everyone’s favourite panto character is always the dame and Justin Brett fills the bloomers very nicely. He improvised a song during an audience participation segment – shout out to Dave the builder from Bromley – and was always on point with the innuendo and the melodrama. Ben Fox is a great foil for Aunt Sarah as Alderman Fitzwarren. The principal cast is rounded out with two more standout characters. The baddie of the piece is Natasha Lewis as Queen Rat, iconic with her sequins and belting vocals. And the wacky sidekick is that humanised cat Uncle Vincent, played by Wayne Rollins, channelling Danny John Jules from his Red Dwarf peak. Both Roo and I thought that and trust me, it’s  a compliment. 

Copyright Broadway Theatre

I need to shout out to the ensemble too, who were superb every time they appeared. I’ve seen a lot of West End performers this year and this cast was just as good as any of them, both in terms of the dancing and the vocals (although I did wonder whether extra vocals were added off stage at some points). Whether they’re rats or fish or cheery cockneys, this group pulled it off.

There’s an eclectic soundtrack – as well as “Rewrite the Stars”, there are versions of “Something Inside So Strong”, “One Love”, “Roar” and “Flowers”. Plus there are a load of original songs, which more than stand up against the better-known tracks. The songs are written by Ben Goddard-Young, who multitasks throughout as keyboard player and musical director. 

Copyright Broadway Theatre

It’s interesting to get Roo’s take on this – at 16 he’s a bit old for the fart gags and a bit young for the adult humour. But he very much enjoyed it – he joined in at all the right parts (“Oy oy Saveloy!”) and laughed at even the corniest of panto gags. As an extremely woke Gen Zer, he appreciated the digs at Reform (and a random barb at Liz Truss) and agreed with the message of the piece. He had a few nitpicks – especially around the physics of being able to survive underwater – but you’d expect that from a Physics A Level student. I wouldn’t advise trying to find logical errors in the plot….it’s a fairytale after all. He and I both agreed there could have been some “Hamilton” references shoehorned in, particularly in the opening scene of an immigrant standing at the bow of a ship heading to a new land, but yknow….theatre kids gotta theatre kid. 

So how to sum up this show? It’s a heady mix of frothy fun and prescient messaging, taking influences from everywhere and revelling in the chaos. There are a lot of local references – I have indeed climbed the hill they mention at the end of Act 1 – and those were warmly received by a diverse audience of community groups and local leaders. Both the mayor and MP were in attendance and both seemed to be having a great time. It was very much a celebration of Catford and South London – Aunt Sarah appears in a Lewisham-flag skirt at one point. Although we haven’t been South Londoners for a decade, it still warms the cockles to see a community being so proud of where they live and work. 

As it happens, we have visited the Broadway Theatre before but it was many moons ago and Roo doesn’t remember it. We met Chris and Pui and look how happy he was at the time:

His tastes might have moved on but he’s still happy to be at the theatre:

I forgot to mention earlier that the theatre also has a reconstruction of a Windrush-era living room in the foyer, right where that picture of Chris and Pui was taken. It’s fascinating and provoked quite some nostalgia in the people around us who were looking at it:

Anyway, if you’re looking for a trad panto with a modern message, this is for you. Especially if you live anywhere near South London. It’s a lot of fun and a great family outing….just watch out for that ocean spray near the end…!

“Dick Whittington and his Catford Cat” runs until 31st December. Click here for tickets and more

Disclaimer: I received tickets in exchange for a review. All opinions remain honest and my own.

Posted in Reviewing the Situation | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“Red” at Chickenshed – 21/11/25

Copyright Chickenshed

It’s panto season! And before you say “oh no it isn’t”, let me present my evidence. Namely that Roo and I just went to our first panto of the year, which was Chickenshed’s version of “Little Red Riding Hood”. Being Chickenshed, there’s obviously a few twists on the classic tale but I’m going to be light on the spoilers as it’s so early in the season.

Roo does seem to be a bit cursed when it comes to the Piccadilly Line – we’ve had troubles on the way to the Shed before and this time we just missed a train at Finsbury Park before waiting a full eight minutes for the next one. Then as soon as we squeezed in, we were told that the train was being held until further notice. I’ve already tangoed with the Victoria Line being suspended this week so had a creeping sense of deja vu dread. Luckily it was resolved fairly quickly and we were soon at Southgate. The ticket barriers are all Burger King-branded and I have to say, advertising works. I mean, we’d already decided that’s where we were going to dine but the advertising certainly helped.

Roo’s curse continued, with a narrow miss of a 298 bus, with no more 298s or 299s on the horizon. We decided to take a punt on a 125 or 382 to get us halfway up Chase Side and then walk the rest. It’s not a route I would choose with VK but with the fast walker, it worked just fine. We arrived in plenty of time and invigorated by the brisk stroll.

So, onto the show! The basic story of “Red Riding Hood” is still there but the quite slight fairytale is fleshed out a lot, with a framing device of The Guardians and the Amulets. The Guardians are celestial beings who watch over the humans and are trying to track the missing amulet that will restore balance in the universe. One amulet ends up around the neck of a Guardian-offspring by the name of Red as she’s on her way to see her Grandma and…you get the idea.

There are five different casts of young people, including the child leads, and we were watching the red cast so I believe we saw Eva Marriott as the titular Red, while Jacob Gee and Seren Gee played her siblings Alex and Sam. The adult leads were played by some of the Chickenshed mainstays such as Michael Bossisse (Wolf), Cara McInanny (Grandma) and Ashley Driver (Woodcutter). The rotating casts have around 150 people in each so, as with previous Chickenshed productions, there is often a very full stage and lots to look at. And there are BSL signers integrated into the show as well, as you’d expect from a theatre so devoted to accessibility.

Every year, the production values at the Shed seem to get more and more impressive. This show starts off with a very stark set but a curtain opening reveals the village of Vargheim, complete with buildings, bridges and mountains. And in case you’re wondering, Vargheim loosely translates to “Wolf Home”….or that’s what Reuben and I figured out, using our joint knowledge of Norse mythology and German. Don’t come for me if I’ve got that wrong. There was also a train carriage set and the wolf’s lair for different scenes before the next big reveal – a Gatsby-like mansion belonging to…well, you’ll have to watch the show to find out. It’s always amazing what they achieve onstage and the bar seems to be raised all the time. I can’t wait to see what they come up with for Christmas 2026.

But you don’t come to Chickenshed for the production values alone. What sets their productions apart is the heart that goes into the stories, and the relationships between the characters. This is no exception – although Red starts off as an angry teen, she goes on quite a journey of self-discovery and learns to appreciate the family around her. The wolf is a complex character – not quite man, not quite beast – and he too goes on something of an emotional journey. There are themes of the evils of capitalism (complete with an audience participation song), mob mentality and acceptance. Along the way there are many twists and turns and some great gags – like when the mob decide that hunting the wolf sounds a bit much too effort so they just shout some angry things and go home.

Copyright Chickenshed

As ever, there are some powerful singers among the cast – Cara McInnany is as impressive as ever – and some new young voices are spotlighted, along with the more established performers. I don’t think I’ve seen Eva Marriott in any lead roles before but her voice was assured and carried well right the way across the audience. There’s some intricate harmony and some nice solos from even the youngest cast members. Chickenshed is always developing new talent and this is a good example of that – I mentioned this in my “Pan” review but the adult performers literally take the younger ones by the hand and show them how to carry the show. It’s this kind of investment in the future that really shows the valuable work Chickenshed does.

There are also some impressive dance routines – notably at the mansion, to a song I think was called “Mula La”. Costuming is used to great effect, as the socialites all sparkle in black sequins, which contrast with the homely brown tweed of the villagers. It’s especially effective when everyone is moving at once. The lighting is also well used, most memorably in a stargazing scene on the mountain, and special mention must go to the live band at the top of the stage, who are occasionally revealed at different points through the show. There’s a lot of music in this show and they were note perfect throughout.

The plot zips by fairly quickly – I think it’s 120 minutes in total and there’s an interval. As Reuben pointed out, there did need to be some fleshing out of the original story but he thought the amulets plot added some real depth to it. He’s a fan of the “mystical treasure hunt” plot device and, although you wouldn’t expect it in “Little Red Riding Hood”, it did work well.

The age recommendation is 5+ and that seems about right to me. The length would be challenging for the very little ones and there are some intense moments, especially when the wolf first appears. The children in front of us were around six to eight and they all seemed to cope well with the peril but it’s worth bearing in mind that the wolf probably would scare a very sensitive child. I didn’t check whether the nearly-adult was scared but I think he was alright.

So if you’re looking for a show with a lot of heart and a fair sprinkling of Christmas magic, “Red” might just be for you. After all, who’s afraid of the Big Bad Wolf?

“Red” runs until 10th January. For tickets and more info, click here

Disclaimer: I received free tickets in exchange for a review. All opinions remain honest and my own. 

Copyright Chickenshed
Posted in Reviewing the Situation | Tagged , | 2 Comments